It is unfortunate, that the draconian Waqf law, facilitating smooth land grab by one section of society (in return for bulk votes in favor of regime), was passed in Parliament with no judicial, media, ex-bureaucrats, people scrutiny. This is a historical wrong, all of today's custodians of law and secular fabric of nation, must apologize to the country for not taking up this cause in 1995 or 2013. Hundreds of thousands of land is illegally grabbed. Take an example of the village in Trichy which is claimed by Waqf. If a homeowner of that village were to contest it legally, it will possibly take him more than 100 years to reach Supreme Court. BUT, the grabber can get immediate hearing. WHY? Because lawyers like Sibal, Singhvi etc have direct approach to SC judges and can organize IMMEDIATE hearing of anything.
Given the gross injustice by the Parliament and Courts in respect of Waqf, if a Dubey raises voice of masses, I completely stand with him. It is inappropriate to point to his language and ignore the message. Protection of Property Rights is the first thing a govt, law, courts must guarantee to its people, but they have failed the hard-working people of the nation. Hope better sense prevails among the Supreme Court judges and they start respecting the will of people of nation and not bulldoze their own woke ideas on them.
When a venerated KBSS has no locus standi in a contentious issue, challenging Quarashi to a debate seems like a futile endeavor. It appears that, in your opinion, the Supreme Court, which is seized of the matter, is also incorrect. Why not send your legal notes to Tushar Mehta
Key Points
-Your lack of locus standi in the issue raises questions about your authority to challenge Quarashi.
-The Supreme Court's involvement in the matter suggests that it may be better equipped to handle it .
-The Maharashtra government's actions regarding Takhat Sri Hazur Sahib's management body are seen as similar to the Waqf Act's provisions.
Have patience.Allow the Supreme Court to adjudicate on the matter, given its expertise and authority.
- Provide Legal Input: Consider sending legal notes to Tushar Mehta or other relevant if you feel strongly
Where was Dr Quarashi or likewise esteemed members of the minority community when the 2013 legislators passed the Draconian WAKF amendment? Did anyone from minority object it? So the comment by Dubey is perfectly ok. Trumpish language is perfectly fine in today’s politics!
How many persons from the minority community have said there should be no WAKF, UCC in our country?
In Oz when the minority wanted Sharia law the PM threatened to deport them and all kept quiet.
They run from their Sharia home countries to create Sharia in the countries they adopt ( look at UK )
It is unfortunate, that the draconian Waqf law, facilitating smooth land grab by one section of society (in return for bulk votes in favor of regime), was passed in Parliament with no judicial, media, ex-bureaucrats, people scrutiny. This is a historical wrong, all of today's custodians of law and secular fabric of nation, must apologize to the country for not taking up this cause in 1995 or 2013. Hundreds of thousands of land is illegally grabbed. Take an example of the village in Trichy which is claimed by Waqf. If a homeowner of that village were to contest it legally, it will possibly take him more than 100 years to reach Supreme Court. BUT, the grabber can get immediate hearing. WHY? Because lawyers like Sibal, Singhvi etc have direct approach to SC judges and can organize IMMEDIATE hearing of anything.
Given the gross injustice by the Parliament and Courts in respect of Waqf, if a Dubey raises voice of masses, I completely stand with him. It is inappropriate to point to his language and ignore the message. Protection of Property Rights is the first thing a govt, law, courts must guarantee to its people, but they have failed the hard-working people of the nation. Hope better sense prevails among the Supreme Court judges and they start respecting the will of people of nation and not bulldoze their own woke ideas on them.
Here's a revised version:
When a venerated KBSS has no locus standi in a contentious issue, challenging Quarashi to a debate seems like a futile endeavor. It appears that, in your opinion, the Supreme Court, which is seized of the matter, is also incorrect. Why not send your legal notes to Tushar Mehta
Key Points
-Your lack of locus standi in the issue raises questions about your authority to challenge Quarashi.
-The Supreme Court's involvement in the matter suggests that it may be better equipped to handle it .
-The Maharashtra government's actions regarding Takhat Sri Hazur Sahib's management body are seen as similar to the Waqf Act's provisions.
Have patience.Allow the Supreme Court to adjudicate on the matter, given its expertise and authority.
- Provide Legal Input: Consider sending legal notes to Tushar Mehta or other relevant if you feel strongly
Thank you for your response.
You have added noise to the signal.
May like to view the following: ⬇️⬇️⬇️
https://www.youtube.com/live/ooqxd90BX0o?si=rK-MH85OytBYtTWK
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/162aaJtSp1/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Hi KBS
Where was Dr Quarashi or likewise esteemed members of the minority community when the 2013 legislators passed the Draconian WAKF amendment? Did anyone from minority object it? So the comment by Dubey is perfectly ok. Trumpish language is perfectly fine in today’s politics!
How many persons from the minority community have said there should be no WAKF, UCC in our country?
In Oz when the minority wanted Sharia law the PM threatened to deport them and all kept quiet.
They run from their Sharia home countries to create Sharia in the countries they adopt ( look at UK )