Rethinking Agriculture in Punjab and Across India: Challenges, Myths, and the Way Forward
With substantial investment in sustainable farming practices, enhanced access to modern technology, and upgraded infrastructure for storage, distribution and marketing to minimize post-harvest losses.
In a thought-provoking video interview, Dr. Devinder Sharma, a well-known agricultural economist, shares his insights on the current state of agriculture in India, with a particular focus on Punjab. He highlights the essential role of agriculture in the country’s economy and food security while addressing the challenges faced by farmers and misconceptions around food surplus. Although the engaging 35-minute conversation is well worth watching, we’ve summarized it here for those who prefer a concise overview in English or may not have the time or patience to invest a full half hour.
Importance of Agriculture
Agriculture is India’s largest sector in terms of employment and food security. It is fundamental to any nation, as food scarcity can become a political weapon. Despite its significance, agriculture receives less media attention compared to crime, entertainment, and politics.
Current Challenges in Punjab's Agriculture
Punjab is facing critical issues, including stubble burning and water scarcity. The perception that India has surplus food production is misleading, given that a large segment of the population still lives in poverty and struggles with hunger.
The Food Surplus Myth
The notion that India is a food surplus country is a misconception. With about 200 million people living in poverty and facing hunger, it is inaccurate to claim food surplus. The challenge of feeding the population persists, and the country cannot afford complacency in food production.
Need for Agricultural Investment
Despite agriculture's importance, it receives only about 3% of the national budget. There is a pressing need for increased investment to make agriculture economically viable. Dr. Sharma suggests allocating at least 10% of the budget to agriculture.
Farmer Income and Market Failures
Farmers' incomes have not kept pace with other sectors. Over 45 years, wheat prices rose 19-fold, while government employees' salaries increased 120-150 times. Global markets have consistently failed to provide fair prices to farmers.
Leadership and Policy Making
There is a need for stronger farmer leadership and policy-making. Dr. Sharma suggests creating a think tank or lobbying group for farmers, similar to industry bodies like CII or FICCI, to influence economic policies effectively.
Global Perspective
A study by the OECD reveals that in most countries, farmers receive positive budget support. However, in India, farmers experience a negative support rate of -6%, meaning they are effectively taxed.
Alternative Development Model
Dr. Sharma advocates for an alternative development model that prioritizes agriculture and rural development over an exclusive focus on urban migration and industrialization.
Additional Perspectives and Mild Critique
The interview could have explored more concrete policy suggestions beyond increasing budget allocation.
While emphasizing agriculture, the discussion might have addressed the need for diversification and modernization in farming practices.
The environmental impact of intensive agriculture, especially in Punjab, could have been further discussed.
Exploring the role of technology and innovation in addressing agricultural challenges would have enriched the discussion.
The mention of farmer leadership could have included examples of successful farmer movements or organizations from other regions.
The interview lacked a detailed discussion on the role of agricultural education and research in improving productivity and sustainability.
Summing Up and Looking Forward
Dr. Sharma’s interview highlights an urgent need for a fundamental shift in India’s agricultural policies. He stresses that to secure a sustainable future, agriculture must be made economically viable through increased budget allocations and stronger farmer leadership in policy-making. His insights reveal the critical importance of treating agriculture as a core pillar of India’s economy and food security rather than an ancillary sector.
Building on Dr. Sharma’s vision, we advocate for a broader range of reforms essential to creating a resilient agricultural system. This includes substantial investment in sustainable farming practices, enhanced access to modern agricultural technology, and upgraded infrastructure for storage and distribution to minimize post-harvest losses. Additionally, we support policies aimed at mitigating environmental impacts and promoting water conservation, particularly in Punjab, where water scarcity has reached crisis levels.
Dr. Sharma’s insights serve as a wake-up call for policymakers, farmers, and the public to rethink agriculture’s central role in India’s development. The path forward demands a collaborative effort to build a more equitable, resilient, and sustainable agricultural sector—one that not only guarantees food security for all but also upholds the dignity of farming by ensuring a fair and decent livelihood for farmers.
I think we should also bring back rhe discussion on farm laws. Those were good laws but pushed very badly in a political sense. What do you think? I mainly support the laws due to the following reasons:
1. Provide the opportunity to sell to anyone they want. Apmc will still be there and msp will be there if required by the farmers.
a. Common criticism - adani, ambani will squeeze the farmers.
i. Retort - farmers can still sell at apmcs
ii. If adani is paying farmer 4inr for tomato instead of apmc paying them 2inr, I see that as a win
2. The MSP and the socialistic outlook on food seems very elitist to me. Think about you, you have the liberty to buy your products from amazon, swiggy, any offline seller and you look for the best price. Why is it not fair to provide the same for farmers? Saying farmers can't engage in mutual agreements with buyers and sellers because the other party will rip them off just seems very elitist to me and that you think of farmers as lesser humans, that they can't take care of themselves.
He is a journalist turned confused "economist". He is inconsistent and contradicts his own view points many times.