Looking Beyond the Donkey and the Elephant in U.S. Politics: Can a Spurned Musk Really “Launch” a Third Political Party?
United States was undoubtedly built by immigrants—could one from South Africa, via Canada, and now a naturalised citizen, spearhead the reshaping of its fossilised polity?
1. Introduction — Past the Barnyard Gate
For nearly two centuries, American voters have trudged into polling booths confronted by a donkey on one side and an elephant on the other. Each beast lugs generations of symbols, loyalties, and political baggage—yet an ever-growing number of citizens now cast their eyes toward the pasture beyond, in search of a fresher, nimbler mount. Elon Musk, bruised by a spectacular fallout with President Donald Trump, now suggests he can build that new ride—presumably one smoother than his SpaceX rocket to Mars.
2. Roots of the Rift — From Fellow Travelers to Bitter Foes
The bromance between Musk and Trump cracked when the “One Big Beautiful Bill” megabill—Trump’s marquee tax-energy-defense package—landed on Capitol Hill. Musk, still heading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) at the time, blasted the measure as “a MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK,” forecasting a $2.4 trillion deficit surge and gutting electric-vehicle incentives vital to Tesla. (Whether this dramatic reference to pork would offend or amuse America’s significant Muslim demographic is, of course, another story—and it’s unclear if Musk himself fully appreciates the underlying cultural sensitivities.) Trump, in turn, publicly chided Musk: “He had no problem with it—until he realized we’d cut the EV mandate.” The alliance dissolved in a flurry of press-conference barbs and late-night posts.
3. Legislative Lightning Rod — The Bill that Bucked Musk
Policy meat was only half the story; pride was the other. EV credits, contract dollars and personal clout converged in the braggadocious Bill’s fine print. When Musk left DOGE on 30 May 2025, he re-emerged online accusing Trump of betrayal and deficit hypocrisy. The President counterpunched by threatening to cancel billions in federal contracts—launch pads, satellites, Starlink links—calling the billionaire “crazy” and “butthurt.” Between the braying donkey of Congressional Democrats and the trumpeting elephant of Republican leadership, Musk suddenly looked politically homeless.
4. From Tweets to Taunts — Personal Salvos in Public Square
Musk lit the fuse with his claim, “Without me, Trump would have lost the election,” to 220 million followers on X. Trump’s retort: Musk only revolted after losing his EV mandate. Accusations of ingratitude, power-trip diagnoses and hints of vengeance (“Go ahead, make my day,” Musk dared) transformed policy disagreement into spectacle—one that spilled from social feeds into stock tickers.
5. Polling the Paddock — The 80 Percent in the Middle
Within hours of Trump’s broadside, Musk asked X users: “Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?” More than 1.4 million votes poured in—over 82 percent shouting “yes.” By framing the idea as refuge for voters trampled by both donkey and elephant, Musk tapped a reservoir of centrist frustration seldom given a ballot line.
6. Strategic Calculus — Forty-Year Horizon versus Four-Year Term
Musk’s follow-up post was telling: “Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years.” The subtext? He sees his political adventure not as a tantrum but as a multi-decade mission—mirroring Tesla’s EV gambit or SpaceX’s Mars dream. His personal capital (financial and reputational) plus platform ownership (X) give him megaphones past generations of third-party dreamers never possessed.
7. History’s Corral — Third-Party Stallions and Stumbles
Yet American electoral terrain is a winner-take-all corral. From the Free Soilers to Ross Perot, insurgents often spur major-party reforms but rarely capture the White House. Ballot-access laws, first-past-the-post math and the big-beast habit of absorbing outsider ideas have broken many spirited colts. Musk must not only ride around the donkey and the elephant, but also jump fences of fundraising, grassroots organizing and candidate recruitment in all 50 states.
8. Markets on Edge — When Politics Jolts Portfolios
Wall Street felt the tremor first. On 5 June 2025, Tesla shares plunged 14 percent, erasing $150 billion in value. Trump Media sagged amid gossip linking the President to Jeffrey Epstein. Investors fretted: Would threatened contract cancellations undercut SpaceX launches and Starlink constellations? While national security needs make a full cutoff unlikely, the feud injected fresh risk into Musk-aligned equities.
9. Organisational Obstacles — Building a Vehicle Between Two Beasts
Turning a poll into a party requires more than rocket fuel. Ballot rules vary by state; field offices need staffing; local candidates must be vetted, funded and disciplined. Can a centrally branded “Musk movement” avoid fracturing when immigration, abortion or foreign policy arise? Crafting a platform broad enough for 80 percent yet concrete enough to govern could prove harder than docking Dragon capsules with the ISS.
10. Tech, Power and Polarization — Rewiring the Public Square
Owning X grants Musk unrivaled capacity to amplify messages and mobilize volunteers—but it also concentrates communication power in one proprietor. Critics worry about algorithmic favoritism; supporters hail a potential end-run around establishment media. Either way, the spectacle intensifies the national conversation about tech tycoons steering democratic debate while the donkey and the elephant lumber in circles.
11. Peering Ahead— A SpaceXit to the Centre
So, can Elon Musk strap the restless 80 percent into a metaphorical starship, teleporting them past the asinine donkey and the lumbering elephant toward a new political reality? History counsels caution; technology tempts audacity. After all, the United States was undoubtedly built by immigrants—could one from South Africa, via Canada, and now a naturalised citizen, spearhead the reshaping of its fossilised polity? Constitutionally barred from ever becoming President himself—only a natural-born citizen may wear that crown—Musk cannot be the King. But he can, perhaps, be the kingmaker.
As the smoke of tweets and veto threats swirls, one old insight rings anew. In Alexander Pope’s immortal words, “What mighty conflicts from trivial causes spring!” Whether this latest clash of egos births a durable third force or just another flash in America’s political cosmos will hinge on Musk’s ability to translate digital enthusiasm into votes—and on whether voters truly crave escape velocity from a Hobson’s choice that has governed their barnyard for generations.
Sir Can we such a thing in India where adani or ambani take stand against modi and its administration on something