Hypothesis: “Wives of Karmayogis are generally unhappy persons.”
The Silent Sorrows of the Karmayogi’s Wife: When Public Duty Overshadows Private Bonds

Introduction: The Veiled Cost of Greatness
Karmayogis are admired for their unwavering commitment to selfless duty. They are the pillars of service and sacrifice, walking the path of righteousness as laid out in the Bhagavad Gita—working without desire for reward. Yet behind their public virtue ften stands a lonely figure—their wife—who watches her partner serve the world, uplift strangers, and fulfil cosmic dharma, while their own family receives fragments of his time and affection.
This article builds on the hypothesis: “Wives of Karmayogis are generally unhappy persons.” It does not aim to question the value of Karma Yoga, but to reflect on its emotional costs at home, especially for those quietly holding up the domestic realm without complaint or recognition.
The Wife’s Dilemma: Pride and Pain Intertwined
The wife of a Karmayogi is not jealous of his work. In fact, she is often proud. She sees her husband as a man of character and conviction—uplifting lives, reforming institutions, healing wounds of society. But while he speaks of compassion in public, she feels the absence of warmth in private.
Her pain is not theatrical. It is measured, enduring, and quiet. She longs for his attention not as a reward, but as a rightful share of his emotional bandwidth. She sees the contradiction:
“You offer patience to the world, but impatience at home. You heal others, but overlook wounds in your child’s heart. You teach sacrifice, but forget that I, too, am sacrificing—your time, your touch, your companionship.”
Mahabharata Example: Arjuna and Subhadra
Among the great epics, the Mahabharata offers a telling example in Arjuna, the ideal Karmayogi. As the recipient of Lord Krishna’s wisdom, he becomes the symbol of detached duty. He fights not for glory, but to uphold dharma.
Yet in his personal life, Arjuna fails to embody this balance. Subhadra, his devoted wife, was the sister of Lord Krishna and Balarama, and daughter of Vasudeva and Rohini. She shares only brief years with Arjuna. Most of her marriage is spent waiting—through his twelve-year exile, pilgrimages, and wars. Their son, Abhimanyu, is raised largely by others. Arjuna grieves for him only when death arrives—he had little role in his life before that.
Subhadra’s sorrow is never shouted in the epic, but its silence is telling. She bears the weight of Arjuna’s public calling, but at great emotional cost.
Detached Duty vs. Intimate Dharma
The Gita teaches action without attachment—but family life is founded on emotional attachment. One cannot parent or be a spouse with detachment alone. The mistake some Karmayogis make is applying the principles of vairagya (detachment) uniformly, forgetting that home is not a battlefield—it is a sacred space that demands presence and care.
A Karmayogi who serves the world but neglects the emotional needs of his family risks becoming a public saint but a private stranger.
A Householder’s Dharma: The Sikh Understanding
In Sikhism, the concept of Karmayoga is not realised through renunciation or retreat to forests, but through righteous action within the framework of worldly life. The ideal is that of the Grihasthi—the householder—who serves God and society while remaining deeply involved in family duties. The Sikh Gurus rejected asceticism and monastic withdrawal, emphasising instead that spiritual growth and selfless service must unfold within the fabric of domestic responsibility. In this view, the welfare of one’s spouse, children, and parents is not peripheral to dharma—it is integral to it. The Karmayogi, therefore, must balance seva (service) with sambhal (care) at home.
Modern Reflections: The Contemporary Household Saint
In today’s world, the archetype of the Karmayogi lives on:
A bureaucrat hailed for integrity, whose daughter knows only his voicemail.
A social worker who feeds the poor, while his own family eats dinner alone.
A spiritual teacher who guides disciples, but forgets his wife’s birthday.
The wife in such households often bears two burdens: admiration for the husband’s ideals and emotional deprivation in her own life. Her unhappiness is not born of selfishness—it is born of being perpetually placed second to the rest of the world.
Conclusion: Expanding the Circle of Duty
The hypothesis—“Wives of Karmayogis are generally unhappy persons”—does not suggest that Karma Yoga is flawed. It only highlights a blind spot. True dharma includes the near and the dear—not just the distant and the suffering. Even traditions like Sikhism insist that salvation and service must emerge from the soil of domestic life, not detachment from it.
The Karmayogi need not abandon his mission. He must only expand it—to include, within the radius of his compassion, the family whose silent sacrifices make his public service possible. In doing so, he will not only uplift the world—but also honour the sacred space called home.
Beautiful thoughts. The universe and humans are extremely complex. One, or two or even a million hypothesis are not enough to cover a small fraction. Family has been an integral part of our culture. Prabhu Ram gave up the throne to fulfil the promise of his father. Sita fulfilled her patni dharma. Yet, Rama deserted her because of society pressure. Guru Nanak performed Udaasis while Mata Tripta took care of his sons. Sri Hari Vishnu is always with Maa Lakshmi. Siva is always with Parvati. Guru Gobind Singh ji took good care of his 4 sons, but then sacrificed them in war. Mata Sundari and Mata Jeeto ji got the grihasthi sukh while Mata Sahib Deva didn't. Times have been and continue to be complex. Our ancestors too sacrificed one thing or the other to achieve or deliver something. It is not easy to be human. As in Ramchartimanas, Raja Ram says, "Siva escaped by consuming the poison once. If he were human, he would know that humans have to consume poison everyday".
Overall, in search of more knowledge (which is key feature of Sanatan), bringing out such wisdom is appreciated, many thanks for this.
ਅਜਿਹੇ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦਾ ਜੀਵਨ ਹਮੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਅਸਾਵੇਂਪਣ ਦਾ ਸ਼ਿਕਾਰ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ। ਅਸਲ ਵਿੱਚ ਮਨੁੱਖਾ ਜੀਵਨ ਦਾ ਝੁਕਾਅ ਇੱਕ ਸਮੇਂ ਇੱਕ ਪਾਸੇ ਹੀ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਉਹ ਆਪਣੇ ਦੂਜੇ ਪੱਖ ਨੂੰ ਅਣਗੌਲਿਆਂ ਕਰ ਦਿੰਦਾ ਹੈ। ਇੱਕ ਗੱਲ ਇਹ ਵੀ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਕੋਈ ਮਨੁੱਖ ਬਾਹਰ ਭਾਵੇਂ ਜਿੰਨਾ ਮਰਜ਼ੀ ਸਤਿਕਾਰਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੋਵੇ ਪਰ ਘਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਉਹ ਇੱਕ ਪੁੱਤਰ,ਪਤੀ ਅਤੇ ਪਿਤਾ ਦੇ ਰੂਪ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੀ ਵੇਖਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਹਰ ਰਿਸ਼ਤਾ ਆਪਣਾ ਹੱਕ ਮੰਗਦਾ ਵੀ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਰੱਖਦਾ ਵੀ ਹੈ।
ਵਿਚਾਰ ਕੇ ਦੱਸਣਾਂ ਜੀ
ਨਿਸ਼ਾਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਕਾਹਲੋਂ